1. Of the instant lawsuit, the part seeking the revocation of the notification with respect to the information set forth in paragraphs 1 and 3 of [Attachment 1].

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On July 3, 2017, the Plaintiff filed a complaint with the Gyeongju Police Station on charges of writing public electromagnetic records, etc., on the grounds that “The property tax ledger on the site B located in the Gyeongju-si was altered in 2002 and 2003 concerning the site B located in the Gyeongju-si,” and that “the Plaintiff’s complaint is difficult to deem that there was a inventory or a new evidence, and that the Gyeongju Police Station sent a reply to the Gyeongju-si Office of the Daegu District Prosecutors’ Office on the grounds that “the Plaintiff’s complaint is difficult to deem that there was a new inventory or a new evidence, and that it could not be determined as a result of the request for appraisal

Accordingly, on September 27, 2017, the public prosecutor of the Daegu High Public Prosecutor's Office dismissed each disposition against C, etc. on the ground that "it is difficult to see that the plaintiff filed a complaint with the same content as the plaintiff, received a disposition of influence of evidence (influence of evidence), and received a disposition of rejection, and that there is no new evidence to prove that the aforementioned disposition of non-prosecution was subsequent to the discovery of evidence."

B. On July 20, 2018, the Plaintiff requested the Defendant to re-appraisal the property tax ledger in the year 2002 and 2003, and filed an objection to the investigation, but the Defendant notified the Plaintiff of the completion of internal investigation on November 26, 2018.

C. On December 4, 2018, the Plaintiff filed a claim with the Defendant for the disclosure of information as follows, and the Defendant notified the Plaintiff of the following answers on December 17, 2018.

Plaintiff’s Claim

1. A taxation ledger and a written appraisal requested for document appraisal in the year 2002, 203;

2. All the difference in the tax ledger in the year 2002, 2003 and the tax ledger in the year 2004, or all the data on investigation of reasons;

3. Defendant's answer, such as whether the Committee comprised of civilian members has fairly and objectively examined in the objection system against investigation.

1. Non-existence of an appraisal document due to a lack of appraisal data;

2. The difference between the processing process of the instant case filed prior to the receipt of the instant complaint with a thickness.