The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds for appeal (two years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The fact that the judgment defendant recognized all of his own crimes, the victim F, and I do not punish the defendant, are favorable to the defendant.

However, the defendant has been punished several times for a crime of the same kind, and in particular, since the punishment of imprisonment for the same crime was served and discharged for a long time, the crime of this case is heavy for several victims.

In the case of a crime against L, when the injured person requests the payment of the victim after taking a cryprym, the victim is seen as having a cryp, and the nature of the crime is considerably poor in light of the circumstances of the crime.

It does not seem that an agreement is made with the victims other than the victim F and I, or the other victims have recovered from the damage.

In addition, in full view of all the conditions of sentencing indicated in the records of this case, including the defendant's age, environment, sex, background and motive of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., it is difficult to see that the sentencing of the court below is unfair because it is too large. Thus, the above assertion by the defendant is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.