A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On August 4, 2016, at around 00:40 on August 4, 2016, the Defendant avoided disturbance, such as: (a) he was charged with trial expenses for taxi engineers and fare at the front parking lot of 105 Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Seoul; (b) he was released from the Defendant’s wife, and was trying to get off and drive a taxi driver by getting on and off the earth’s surface under the influence of alcohol.

Accordingly, the Defendant, who was demanded from the Seoul Western Police Station Down F to return home upon receipt of the report 112, took a bath to “a sprink that would be sprinked only once sprink, sprink to sprink,” and the Defendant, who threatened the above E and F with drinking, and continued to restrain it, expressed that “a fright to sprink, detained, and fright to bitch” to the police box G at the police box belonging to the said police box, and assaulted by the Defendant, such as “a fright to spice, detained, and fright to dump,” and “a fright to the right part of G’s right part by drinking at the left hand.”

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officials concerning the handling of reports and the maintenance of order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the police statement concerning G;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime concerned;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Circumstances unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act: The instant crime was committed by assaulting a police officer performing his/her duties, thereby obstructing the exercise of public authority, and its nature is not good.

The motive leading to the instant crime is not good, and the number of victimized police officers is three.

Although the defendant had been punished for the same kind of crime in the past, he again committed the crime in this case.

The favorable circumstances: the defendant reflects his fault.

The defendant seems to have committed the crime of this case in a drunken manner.

(k) damage;