The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. With respect to the part concerning interference with business 1) misunderstanding of facts, the defendant raised a suspicion of tobacco smoking at the time, and made a fluence with the victim while making a fluence, but did not make the victim take a bath or fluence against female customers, and did not exercise any power to the extent that it interferes with the victim’s business, but the court below found the defendant guilty of this part of the facts charged. The court below erred by misapprehending the facts or by misapprehending the legal principles as to the force of the crime of interference with business, thereby affecting the conclusion of the judgment. 2) As to the retaliation intimidation portion, the defendant, in relation to the Defendant’s speech and behavior at the time, such as “I fluen the victim’s head,” and “I fluen the victim’s head,” and “I fluen the fluent, I am. It was found guilty of this part of the facts charged, which affected the judgment.

B. The sentence imposed by the lower court (one year and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. Comprehensively taking account of each of the following circumstances acknowledged by the lower court’s duly adopted and investigated evidence, legal principles, and evidence rules, the Defendant may be recognized as having interfered with the victim’s business and threatened the victim for the purpose of retaliation as stated in each of the facts charged in the instant case. Thus, the lower court’s findings of fact and judgment (detailedly stated in the 3 to 7th page of the lower judgment) cannot be deemed to have any error, and the Defendant’s assertion

1. Part concerning interference with business ① The witness of the political party stated to the effect that “Around December 27, 2014, the convenience store of this case was put to the convenience store of this case, but the Defendant could not be deemed to drive away from customers due to his bath, etc.” However, the hours that H left to the convenience store of this case are limited to one minute, and that he was in the front of his convenience store.”