Text
The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.
Of the facts charged of this case, the prosecution against assault is dismissed.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On September 14, 2015, the Defendant, on September 20, 2015, entered the entrance door opened to the victim E (the son, the son, the son, the son, the son of the victim (the son, the son, the son, the son) and the son, the son, the son, the son, the son of the victim, and the son, the son, the son, the son, the son, the son, the son of the son, the son, the son, the son, the son, the
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Application of laws and regulations on police statements made to C and D;
1. Article 319 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 319 of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;
1. Penalty fine of 300,000 won to be suspended;
1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse (100,000 won per day);
1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act of the Suspension of Sentence (the Defendant did not have any record of having been sentenced to one time before and after being sentenced to a fine, and the Defendant appears to have committed the instant crime contingently as his child was bullying, and thus his child seems to have committed the instant crime, such as having divided his mistake and not repeating the crime, having agreed with the victim, and having faithfully lived with the victim) was indicted on the charges that the Defendant committed the assault of the victim C (the Defendant was 9 years of age) on the ground that the Defendant’s abduction of the victim’s son’s children was bullying, and that he committed the assault of the victim.
This is a crime falling under Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Code, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim's express intent under Article 260 (3) of the Criminal Code. Since the victim withdraws his wish to punish on July 18, 2016, which was after the prosecution of this case, the victim is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 (6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.