1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is an insurer who has concluded a comprehensive motor vehicle insurance contract with a vehicle A (hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiff”) which is an early 19 tons of grassland truck, and the Defendant is an insurer who has concluded an automobile insurance contract with a vehicle B (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant vehicle”).

B. At around 20:15 on February 17, 2014, C driven the Plaintiff’s vehicle to drive an by-products of a volume of 7 tons, and stopped the Plaintiff’s vehicle while driving the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the ambato, while driving along the two-lanes of the ambato, while neglecting the duty of ambato, while driving along the two-lanes of the ambato. The Plaintiff’s vehicle stopped D at 15.40m, and the damaged amba to 90.24m or amba to the amba.

(hereinafter “1st accident”). C. A. A. A. A. A. A. A had access to the place where the vehicle was landed from the vehicle to the place where D was used, but the vehicle reported the accident to 112 and was waiting on the street. Since a few minutes, E, who was driving the Ecoo vehicle, stopped and stopped the first accident site, and divided with C. D. D. At that time, F, who was working the Defendant vehicle, did not look at the first accident site and used on the street and stopped D. D. A. A. E. (hereinafter “2 accident”).

When the police was called out, D had already died due to brain damage and multi-presidential long-term damage.

The Plaintiff paid 48,123,540 won to the bereaved family members of D as agreed amount.

[Ground of Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, Eul evidence 2, Eul evidence 3-1, 2, Gap evidence 4, Gap evidence 8, Eul evidence 11, Eul evidence 2-13, Eul evidence 3, Eul evidence 4, the purport of the whole pleadings and arguments

2. The plaintiff's assertion that the first accident and the second accident were concurrently caused death of D. The plaintiff paid KRW 48,123,540 to the defendant, who is a joint tortfeasor.