The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and four months.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the reasons for appeal (two years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Prior to the judgment on the grounds of ex officio appeal, prior to the judgment on the grounds of appeal by authority, the Prosecutor applied “a special larceny attempted” to the name of the crime under 2016 highest order of 935, and “Article 342 of the Criminal Act” to the name of the crime under 2016 highest order of 935, respectively, and “a total of 27 times” to “a total of 27 times in the facts charged was stolen or attempted to steals the victim’s property” to read “a total of 27 times in combination with C, the Defendant stolen or attempted to steals the victim’s property,” and thereby, the lower judgment was no longer maintained.

3. Thus, the judgment of the court below is reversed in accordance with Article 364 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Act without examining the defendant's unfair argument of sentencing, and the judgment below is reversed, and it is again decided as follows after pleading.

【The grounds for the judgment that was used again] The facts constituting the crime and the summary of the evidence acknowledged by the court and the summary of the evidence are as follows: “The victim’s property was stolen over 27 times in total” in the end of the 2016 highest order 935 highest order of the judgment of the court below, and “the victim’s property was stolen or attempted to steals over 27 times in total,” thereby changing to “the defendant stolen the victim’s property in combination with C,” thereby “the defendant committed a theft of the victim’s property or attempted to steals the victim’s property in combination with C,” and the victim’s loss column in the column of the crime scene No. 20th order of the crime scene No. 20th order of the annexed crime list No. 20.