Text
1. The Defendant: KRW 8,191,33 of the Plaintiff, and KRW 5% per annum from August 19, 2016 to November 24, 2017, respectively, shall be the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. On July 7, 2001, the Plaintiff newly constructed the Suwon-si, Suwon-si, and two lots of ground D buildings (hereinafter “instant building”) and leased No. 102 of the said building to E (hereinafter “instant store”). From July 31, 2001, E operated the instant store’s task of “F” from around July 31, 2001.
Article 5 [Termination of the Initial Lease Contract] ① Upon termination of the lease contract, the lessee (the defendant) is assigned the above real estate from the G, and the lessee (the defendant) bears all of the expenses incurred by the lessee (the defendant) at the time of termination of the contract, and restore the lease to its original state due to the condition of interior (basic facilities =,00,00 (Amtex), floor (Amtex), partitions, partitions, etc. (2).
(2) A lessee shall restore the lessee to its original state at the time any problem, such as damage, damage, inundation, flood, flood control, equal heat, etc., other than basic facilities, during the term of lease, by bearing all expenses.
Reconciliation Clause of this case
4.The respondent shall compensate for losses or restore to its original state in the following cases:
(1) In case where a family member or employee of the respondent intentionally or negligently causes damage to a third party or causes damage to the applicant, (2) fire and theft, damage to an object, or other loss; 10. In case where the applicant returns the security deposit to the respondent, the Respondent shall refund the unpaid rent and delayed loss, taxes and public charges which the Respondent did not pay, taxes and public charges which the Respondent did not pay, the cost of restoring the building for the original state, and the amount of damages caused by the damage to other
B. The Defendant acquired the sales right and facility of the instant store through G. The Defendant transferred the sales right and facility of the instant store.
On September 8, 2009, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with the Defendant on No. 601-1 of the instant store and the instant building (hereinafter “the first lease agreement”) and concluded the said lease agreement with the Suwon District Court No. 2009Da125 against the Defendant.