The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentencing of the lower court (two months of imprisonment, confiscation, additional collection of KRW 656,00) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The instant crime is a case where the Defendant had engaged in arranging commercial sex acts for a period of three months, and there are more favorable circumstances to consider, such as the fact that the period of business is not long and that profits are not high, and that the Defendant is against the Defendant’s confession of the crime.

B. Meanwhile, in light of the fact that the act of arranging sexual traffic does not have a significant impact on society, such as harming the sound sexual culture and good morals by commercializing women's sex, and requires a simple and severe punishment to prevent the spread of illegal sexual traffic establishments, and to establish a sound sexual culture, and that the Defendant repeatedly commits the instant crime even though his previous convictions due to the same criminal act are two times (one time, one time, one time, one time, one time, one time, etc.), it is inevitable to punish the Defendant with severe punishment and sentence.

In addition, considering all the sentencing factors indicated in the records of this case, such as the defendant's age, family relation, living environment, details and result of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, the sentence of the court below is adequate.

3. The defendant's appeal is without merit and thus dismissed pursuant to Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.