Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

Except as otherwise provided for in Acts and subordinate statutes, no person of the 2015 High Court Decision 2657 shall transfer any means of access necessary for electronic financial transactions to any third party.

Nevertheless, on June 3, 2014, the Defendant accepted the proposal that “The Defendant would pay KRW 3 million per month on the face of transfer of the passbook” from a person with no personal name, and transferred the means of access to each of the cMA C cards linked to the passbook (Account Number C) and the new investment bond passbook (Account Number D) to another person through Kwikset Services.

No motor vehicle which is not covered by the mandatory insurance of 2015 fixed-term 2715 shall be operated on the road.

Nevertheless, on April 6, 2015, the Defendant operated an Estststun vehicle owned by the neighboring industry, which was not covered by the mandatory automobile insurance at approximately 1 km section from 16:00 Suwon-si transfer-si to 3:0 Gyeongdong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong.

Summary of Evidence

"2015 High Court 2657"

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A copy of the police statement concerning F;

1. A copy of the financial transaction information "2015, 2715";

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to report on the occurrence of cases and to notify the detection of vehicles subject to administrative dispositions;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Articles 49 (4) 1 and 6 (3) 1 of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act, Articles 46 (2) 2 and the main sentence of Article 8 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, and selection of fines, respectively;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act provides that the defendant was punished for violating the same kind of Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act for the reasons for sentencing of the provisional payment order, the defendant is both led to a confession and reflective act, and lives in a shelter for the homeless and self-support.