The defendant paid KRW 149,773,752 to the plaintiff as well as 5% per annum from June 23, 2018 to December 9, 2020.

At around 05:01 on June 23, 2018, C driven a D M&L car (hereinafter referred to as “ASS”) with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.095%, and caused the Plaintiff to take a pressure less than 1.2 tons of the Plaintiff’s operating taxi and the air traffic signal at the third-lane of the atmosphere in Gwangju Mine-gu to the 4-lane erode of the erode, with a speed of 118km at a speed exceeding 60km at a speed of 118km at a speed exceeding 60km at the speed of the erode of the erode.g., the Plaintiff’s operating taxi and the air traffic signal at the third-lane of the atmosphere, without any particular measure of the Plaintiff’s erode.g., the Plaintiff’s pressure.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). The Defendant is a mutual aid business operator who has entered into a motor vehicle mutual aid agreement with respect to the said sea-going vehicle.

[Ground of recognition] According to the facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2, Eul evidence No. 1 and Eul evidence No. 1 (including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), and the facts of recognition as above, the defendant is liable to compensate the plaintiff for damages caused by the accident of this case as the insurer of the above sea vehicle.

The Defendant’s limitation of liability is erroneous in failing to wear the safety belt at the time of the instant accident, and thus, considering this, the Defendant’s scope of liability is 90%. However, it is not sufficient to recognize only the statement of evidence No. 2, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it. Therefore, the Defendant’

In addition to the matters stated separately below the scope of liability for damages, it shall be the same as each corresponding item of the attached Table of the calculation of damages.