logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2015.10.22 2015고단663
사기
Text

The defendant is not guilty, and the summary of the judgment of innocence is publicly notified.

Reasons

Summary of the revised facts charged

1. From around 2013, the Defendant has been serving as the site manager of Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “D”) with respect to construction contracts and subcontracting contracts.

On January 7, 2014, the Defendant was awarded a contract for the three new construction works of the Easung Factory in Ansan-si from the E Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “E”) for KRW 979,000,000, and was awarded a contract for the two new construction works of the Hasung Factory in Ansan-si from H Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “H”) at the time of Ansan-si, and was awarded a contract for KRW 957,00,000,00 for the two new construction works of the Hasung Factory in Ansan-si, Inc. (hereinafter “H”) at the Defendant’s request to construct the Easung Factory Bdong and Hasung Factory in the structure of reinforced concrete at the time of granting the permission for the construction works.

On February 5, 2014, the Defendant concluded a subcontract with the victim company for construction work in a reinforced concrete structure by designing “1,200,000 won among the E-dong and H inside factories,” excluding the part of the construction work that was contracted between the victim and the victim, for the employees in charge of the victim’s continental development company, to build the Nadong and H operation 3 floors among the E-dong and H operation in a steel panel structure on the third floor of the building “K cafeteria” located at the YJ of Ansan-si, Ansan-si, 20,000 won for construction work cost by designing “1,20,000 won among the E-dong and H inside factories, excluding the above E-dong and H operation 3 floors as to the construction work part among the new construction work contracted as above. From that date, the victim company had the victim company construct the reinforced concrete structure and caused

2. On April 2014, the Defendant: (a) at the construction site above the end of the victim company, decided to change the structure of the steel-frame structure of the 3rd floor in operation among the Nadong and H inside factories; and (b) the steel-frame structure of the third floor among the H inside factories.

As the design has been modified, the construction cost shall be paid by E, etc., and the construction cost shall be paid without molding.

arrow