logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 원주지원 2017.01.09 2016고단1213
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of traffic Acts on roads;

A. On November 15, 2016, the Defendant driven B rocketing car under the influence of alcohol content of approximately 0.148% from the 5km section from the site near the land site located in the original city-based city-based city-based city-based city-based around the same time to the interesting area-based commercial zone-based entertainment.

B. On November 15, 2016, around 02:54, the Defendant driven a B rocketing car with a alcohol content of 0.170% from the 500-meter section from the C’s intersection to the D convenience store located in C from the C’s intersection to the D convenience store.

2. On November 15, 2016, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (e.g., post-accidents) (e., the Defendant was driving a B rocketing car on an interest-based entertainment-based entertainment-based entertainment-based entertainment-based entertainment-based entertainment-based entertainment-based entertainment-based (e.g., a speed of about 80km at a speed of 10km as soon as possible on the surface of the interest-based entertainment-based entertainment-based entertainment-based.

There is an intersection where signal apparatuses are installed, and plastic shock tanks and regulatory bars play a boundary line near the center line are installed, so the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to safely operate the steering and steering gear by accurately manipulating the steering and steering gear.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant was able to receive plastic shock tanks and regulatory seals, which are owned by the victim as the front part of the passenger car of the Defendant, due to the negligence of neglecting it.

Ultimately, even though the Defendant damaged the property to have a considerable amount of KRW 1,243,00, such as replacement of shock absorption tank to the victim due to the above occupational negligence, the Defendant left away without immediately stopping and taking necessary measures.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Reports on traffic accidents, and reports on the occurrence of traffic accidents;

1. Written estimate;

1. Inquiries about the results of crackdown on driving under drinking;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Criminal facts;

arrow