A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Around 22:55 on February 24, 2019, the Defendant: (a) reported 112 to the Ocafeteria located in Daegu Northern-gu B, Daegu; and (b) confirmed that D’s circumstances leading up to the Cdistrict called the Defendant and the owner of the business after having reported 112, “D has listened to the details of the report, etc. separated between the Defendant and the owner of the business; and (c) had no occupant in the restaurant; and (d) tried to have the owner of the business who had confirmed personal information and the hearing of the statement after searching the Defendant’s horse at the end of the Defendant, and tried to have the owner of the business after completing personal information confirmation and the hearing of the statement, and thereby interfered with the police officer’s legitimate performance of his duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of each police statement of D and E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to police investigation reports (verification of CCTV at generated places and submission of photographs);

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. 집행유예 형법 제62조 제1항 양형의 이유 식당에서 괜한 트집으로 행패를 부리고 아버지 나이의 경찰관에게 완력을 휘두른 점을 감안할 때 재범 방지를 위한 엄한 경고가 필요하여 징역형을 선택함. 다만, 만취상태에서 잃어버린 외투에 집착한 나머지 우발적으로 저지른 범행으로 보이는 점, 피고인이 술이 깬 후 곧바로 피해 경찰관을 찾아가 사죄하고, 식당주인에게 피해를 변상하여 용서를 받은 점, 종전에 처벌받은 전력이 거의 없는 점, 피고인의 나이와 성행 및 가족관계에 비추어 볼 때 재범의 위험성은 크게 우려되지 않는 점 등의 유리한 사정을 참작하여 형의 집행을 유예함. 이상의 이유로 주문과 같이 판결한다.