1. All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.

Purport of claim and appeal

1.

1. The reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as the corresponding part of the reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the parts dismissed or added as follows, and thus, it shall be cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

2. The 10th 15th 11th 2nd 2nd 10th 2nd 10th 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 3

Defendant E, throughout the period of time from February 201 to May 201, 201, acquired a total of KRW 510 million from Plaintiff E as investment money. However, Defendant E, from February 17, 2011 to July 2, 2012, paid to Plaintiff A a total of KRW 312,90,000,000,000 as compensation for damage, taking into account the details of the above return between Plaintiff and Plaintiff on August 20, 2012, Defendant E prepared a notarial deed of the first monetary loan contract of this case with Defendant E to settle the amount of KRW 150,000,000 to Plaintiff A by the end of December 2012. Accordingly, Defendant E is merely obligated to pay the said KRW 150,000,000 to Plaintiff A for delay damages.

However, the Plaintiff’s 150 million won, which was remitted from April 2, 2012 to April 11, 2012, among the 312.9 billion won, for which Defendant E claimed that he paid damages to the Plaintiff, was returned part of the KRW 300 million, which was paid to Defendant E as investment funds as indicated in the above paragraph (3), is excluded from the claim amount for damages to Defendant E. Meanwhile, according to the overall purport of each of the statements and arguments in the evidence Nos. 13 through 19, 37, and 1 and 4, the Defendant E received money from the Plaintiff as investment funds, and the amount of KRW 600,000,000,000,000,000 from April 2, 2012, and KRW 470,000,000,000,000,000,000 won, as stated in the above paragraph (1) shall be paid to the Plaintiff E.