A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

"2013 Highest 2775"

1. On January 16, 2013, the Defendant told the victim E at the second-class D certified judicial scrivener office of Sinpo City, Mapo-si, the second-class D judicial scrivener office of Mapo-si, Mapo-si, that the Defendant borrowed KRW 60 million from Geumcheon-gu Seoul, Seoul, which had leased the house, as security, to use the loan deposit amount of KRW 80 million for the total loan deposit of the F deposit of Geumcheon-gu, Seoul, which had leased the house, as three (3) interest, and to have it repaid without the mold.

However, in fact, the Defendant did not have the money to be paid as the deposit at the time, and there was no intention or ability to pay the money even if he borrowed the money from the victim because the amount of debt was equivalent to KRW 150 million.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 57 million from the victim.

2. On April 12, 2013, the Defendant stated that “Around April 12, 2013, the Defendant would use 10,000,000 won as 4,000 interest, 2 months in borrowing the said victim, on the ground that it is necessary to pay the insurance money,” at the office of the said D Judicial Scriveners office.

However, in fact, the Defendant did not have the money to be paid as the deposit at the time, and there was no intention or ability to pay the money even if he borrowed the money from the victim because the amount of debt was equivalent to KRW 150 million.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 9.6 million from the victim.

around September 23, 2012, the Defendant stated that “If money is urgently needed on a day related to insurance, she will pay interest on the five-month amount,” while acting as if he/she had the ability to pay money by showing a real estate lease agreement of KRW 80,000,000,000 under a contract with the lessor I, which was put by the victim H, and the Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F building to the victim H.”

However, the facts are that the defendant did not receive money from the I referred to at the time as the deposit, and the defendant's obligations to the I and the I and the I have the right to bank.