logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2016.02.02 2015고정1013
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Around 01:00 on August 14, 2015, the Defendant: (a) driven a car by BP A while driving the car in front of the point in the front city of the Gosidong of the North Korean bank in the front city of the front city in the front city of the city of the front city, resulting in the Defendant’s injury, such as salt, tension, etc., in need of treatment for about 10 days, to the victim E, who is the passenger of the damaged vehicle, by neglecting the front city of the front city; (b) caused the Defendant’s negligence in the course of performing duties, which led to the Defendant’s failure to conduct the front city of the city; and (c) caused the Defendant’s injury, such as salt, tension, etc., of the trend requiring treatment for about 10 days.

2. The instant facts charged constitute a crime falling under Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 268 of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent pursuant to the main sentence of Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents.

According to the records, the victims expressed their intention not to be punished against the defendant on February 1, 2016, which was after the prosecution of this case was instituted.

Therefore, the public prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow