1. The Defendant’s KRW 21,834,299 as well as 5% per annum from June 1, 2013 to December 23, 2015 to the Plaintiff.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. The facts of recognition are as follows: (a) around 15:00 on June 1, 2013, the Defendant committed assault by asking the Plaintiff’s left hand hand over and asking the Plaintiff’s face on the Plaintiff’s house, and asking the Plaintiff’s right hand over and assaulting at the Plaintiff’s house of Seongbuk-gu and the third floor; (b) on the part of the Plaintiff’s house, the Plaintiff frighted the Plaintiff’s window and frighted the Defendant.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant assault.” Accordingly, the Plaintiff suffered injury, such as a closed pelke, saves, saves, saves and coordinatess, and the 5th left-hand balance, each of the saves chronological difficulties, i.e., depression, e., stress disorder.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1, 2, 5 through 10, Eul 4, 5 and the purport of the whole pleadings

B. The defendant is obligated to compensate for damages suffered by the plaintiff due to the assault of this case.

2. Except as otherwise stated below within the scope of liability for damages, each corresponding item of the attached Table of Calculation of Compensation Amount.

In principle, the period for the convenience of calculation shall be calculated on a monthly basis, but the period of less than the last month and less than KRW 1 shall be discarded.

The calculation of the current value at the time of the accident shall be based on the reduction rate of 5/12 percent per month to deduct the interim interest.

In addition, it is rejected that the parties' arguments are not stated separately.

In light of the Plaintiff’s age, career, health conditions, working conditions, etc. at the time of the assault in this case, it is reasonable to view that the Plaintiff (the Plaintiff 61 year old and 1 month at the time of the assault in this case) as an urban daily worker and can be operated until the 22th day of each month reaches the age of 63 years.

【Plaintiff asserted that the wage of painting should be applied, but the Plaintiff obtained the Plaintiff’s certificate of qualification related to painting solely on the evidence (A, A 14, 16, 19) submitted by the Plaintiff.

(b).