logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2013.08.29 2013고정81
상해
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 1,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

The Defendants respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. At around 00:40 on March 7, 2012, Defendant B, while under the influence of alcohol at “Fju,” located in Ulsan-gun E, Ulsan-gun, the Defendant: (a) dumped the victim A (44 years old); (b) dumped the victim A (44 years old); (c) dumped the victim’s body, dumped the victim’s body, dumped the victim’s body; and (d) dumped the victim’s body, dumped the victim’s fingers the victim’s fingers for about six weeks of treatment; and (b) dump (closed, closed, 4, 5, and 6 days on the left side of the victim’s hand; and (c) inflicted injury on the victim, such as the victim’s dump.

2. Defendant A, at the time, and at the place specified in paragraph (1), had flicked bombs against the victim B (the age of 27) as seen above, and carried out physical fighting, and had the victim go beyond the floor, and had the victim suffered injury, such as the right spathic spathic spathic spathic spas

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each legal statement of witness G, H and I;

1. Each police statement made to G, I, and H;

1. G statements;

1. Each injury diagnosis letter;

1. Injury photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (on the spot situation at the time of entry);

1. Defendants of relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A: Articles 21(2) and 55(1)6 of the Criminal Act (Article 21(2) of the Criminal Act (Article 55(1)6 of the Act) (Article 21(1) of the Criminal Act (Article 21(2) of the Act means an act to defend the victim’s attack against the victim A; however, since the degree of the act of defense was only past and the victim suffered serious injury on the part of the victim, it constitutes excessive self-defense).

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act or more.

arrow