logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2015.05.22 2014나1779
손해배상(기)
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant exceeding the amount ordered to be paid below shall be revoked.

Reasons

Reasons for the judgment of the first instance court, paragraphs 1 and 2 of the judgment of the first instance court

A. 1) On the first head of the first head of the Hobuyal part of the first line, “No company under the Commercial Act,” “for convenience,” respectively, [the evidence No. 16, 17 is added to the grounds for recognition, and the judgment of the first instance court No. 1]

B. (2) The second line’s “30,202 households” is changed to “30,639 households (including 25,132 households transferred to 5,132 households, including 437 households). It is identical to the court’s instructions other than using the following contents. As such, it is accepted pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act as it is. [42,709,295 won out of the transfer price to 3rd end of the 3rd under the first sentence of the first instance judgment [42,709,295 won, the Plaintiff changed to the effect that the amount of damages incurred by the Plaintiff was equivalent to KRW 42,709,295, June 18, 2014, and the Plaintiff did not pay damages to the Plaintiff for the last 30 years due to the Plaintiff’s failure to perform its business operation under the first sentence of the 30th instance judgment and the second sentence of the 320th judgment on the damages incurred by the Plaintiff.”

amount equivalent to the value of the corporation;

I would like to say.

The plaintiff.

arrow