logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.07.24 2014고단4072
공무집행방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around May 19, 2014, at around 23:10, the Defendant: (a) reported on May 19, 2014 that the Defendant was used by the Defendant at the Cheongdong-dong 14, Jongno-gu Seoul, Jongno-gu, Seoul, Police Station B police box affiliated with the Seoul, Police Station B police box, which was called as “the victim died of feass such as the Defendant’s feassty, the opening of the same year feas, sick, and feass, feass, and boms; (b) where feass such feass are raised.”

Accordingly, the defendant openly insultingd the victim.

2. On May 19, 2014, the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender in front of the police box located in Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, on the street, and arrived at the above B police box in front of the police box as described in paragraph (1). After having arrived at the police box in front of the police box located in Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the Defendant took a bath for C to get the Defendant to get the Defendant from the police box, and assaulted by C, on the floor of his hand, the face of the above C at one time with his/her cell phone, with his/her cell phone at one time, with his/her left face taken one time, and with approximately three times his/her mouth taken off.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the escort of police officers.

3. On May 20, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 00:30 on May 20, 2014, the Defendant: (b) was able to take a bath within the police box located in Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and continued the development of the course; (c) thereby destroying a chemical part of which the market price, which is the possession of the said police box, could not be known at the front corner of the computer, could not be seen; and (d) the Defendant got out of the bridge and walked.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C’s accusation and statement;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs by cutting background C, damaged articles, and screen images;

1. Relevant Articles 311 and 136 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts

arrow