logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2016.06.17 2016고정399
변호사법위반
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4 million, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2 million.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A around June 2014, at the Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D D D’s ceremony, the victim F, who became aware of through G, is the head of the Seoul Central Symna Police Station, and as the head of the Seoul Central Symna Police Station, “I would like to know well the case under investigation at the Seoul Young Military Police Station,” and received a request from the victim who trusted the request for the resolution of the above case, and around that time, Defendant B “I would introduce any person who is aware of the case at the Seoul Young Military Police Station,” and Defendant B agreed to receive the money in the name of school expenses in relation to the case to be handled by the damaged public official.

Accordingly, on August 20, 2014, Defendant A received KRW 5 million from the victim’s wife G to the post office account (H) in its name, and KRW 2 million from the victim on August 23, 2014 to the same account. Defendant B received money from Defendant A to the company bank account (I) in its name on August 20, 2014.

Ultimately, the Defendants received money and valuables under the pretext of soliciting the case or affairs handled by public officials in collusion.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Part concerning G statement in the second interrogation protocol against Defendant A, which is the second interrogation protocol against Defendant A

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. A complaint;

1. Investigation report (report on the purport of accusation filed by the complainant);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on transactions in passbooks;

1. Defendants of the relevant legal provisions and the choice of punishment for criminal facts: the respective defense laws and subordinate statutes Article 111 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 30 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants to be detained in the workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. The Defendants who are additionally collected: the latter part of Article 116 of the Defense Justice Act; and

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

arrow