본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2015.11.18 2015고단2184
도로법위반
Text
The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.
Reasons
1. On May 23, 1994, at around 12:55, May 23, 1994, A, an employee of a specific defendant in the facts charged, violation of vehicle operation restriction: (a) the penal provisions applied to a summary order subject to review, which was rendered unconstitutional by the Constitutional Court, lose its retroactive effect (see, e.g., Constitutional Court Order 2010Hun-Ga14, 15, 21, 27, 35, 38, 44, 70, Oct. 28, 2010). Accordingly, the Defendant is acquitted pursuant to the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the summary of the judgment of the Defendant is publicly notified pursuant to Article 44