A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 02:30 on May 16, 2019, the Defendant was driving a C-A-burged vehicle in the state of alcohol with a blood alcohol concentration of about 11k from the section of approximately 11k alcohol to the T-A-burg, T-ri, T-ri, T-ri, T-ri, T-ri, T-ri, T-ri, T-ri, T-ri, T-ri, T-ri, 201.

2. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury) and the Road Traffic Act (Non-accident after Accidents) are those engaged in driving a motor vehicle from Chump.

On May 16, 2019, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol of 0.151% with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.151% 0.0% on May 16, 2019, and driven the road of 4-lanes in the direction of Seoul, the outer cycle Highway in the mountain direction of the day-to-day and the two tunnels in the two states along the three-lanes from the HawonIC to the TriIC.

There are two roads in a tunnel where a white solid line prohibiting the change of a lane is installed, and the E-SaX J car driven by the victim D(30 years of age) is in progress at the second lane, so the driver has a duty of care to operate the steering boat and the brake system accurately by accurately operating the steering boat and the steering system without changing the lane.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and was negligent in changing the vehicle line into two-lanes due to the negligence of changing the vehicle line into two-lanes as above, and received the part next to the Defendant’s driver’s seat.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by occupational negligence, sustained injury to salt and tensions in need of treatment for about three weeks, and at the same time escaped without immediately stopping the vehicle of the victim to the extent that the repair cost, such as the front pentum exchange, was 11,915,101 won, and the repair cost, such as the front pentum exchange, did not take necessary measures, such as aiding the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. On-site map and actual survey report on traffic accidents;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Requests for blood collection appraisal;