1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The grounds for the plaintiff's claim are as shown in the annexed sheet.

2. We examine ex officio the legitimacy of the instant lawsuit.

The benefit of confirmation in a lawsuit for confirmation is unclear between the parties and the existence or absence of the legal relationship, which is the subject matter of the lawsuit, so that the relationship can be immediately determined, and there is a benefit of confirmation in the case where the risks or instability existing in the plaintiff's rights or legal status can be removed, and even though the claim for confirmation of the existence of the claim for performance itself is able to bring a lawsuit for performance, it is not effective to eliminate anxietys and it

In light of the above legal principles, the Plaintiff and the Defendant are not related to the obligee and the obligor of the claim for the return of the lease deposit seeking the confirmation, and ② the Plaintiff may file a lawsuit seeking the return of the lease deposit by asserting that the assignment order indicated in the attached Form is null and void against the obligor of the claim for the return of the lease deposit, as alleged in such claim, and ③ the confirmation judgment was issued on the reversion of the claim for the return of the lease deposit between the Plaintiff and

In light of the fact that the effect of the judgment does not extend to the debtor of the claim for the return of the above lease deposit, the lawsuit of this case filed against the defendant does not constitute a case where the existence or absence of legal relations, which is the subject matter of the lawsuit, can be immediately determined by the parties, and thus, the risk or instability existing in the plaintiff's rights or legal status can be eliminated. Thus, there is no benefit from

I would like to say.

3. The instant lawsuit is unlawful and thus dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.