The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the summary of the grounds for appeal (a fine of three million won) is too unreasonable.

2. Even when considering the fact that the defendant recognized each of the crimes of this case as well as reflects the fact that there is no past punishment force exceeding the fine, and that there is no economic situation, each of the crimes of this case is likely to be unfair since the defendant committed the crimes of this case in light of the following circumstances: (a) the defendant committed the crime of this case two times in the dispute with the general director of the Institute of Public Notice that is the victim; (b) assaulted the victim on two occasions; (c) damaged his property; and (d) repeatedly operated a vehicle not covered by mandatory insurance and caused traffic accidents; and (e) the nature of the crime is not good; and (e) other circumstances constituting the conditions for sentencing, such as the defendant’s age, character, character, environment, family relationship, motive and circumstance of the crime, etc.,

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.