1. Defendant B shall receive on September 9, 199 from C each real estate listed in the separate sheet.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff’s lawsuit against C, etc. filed a lawsuit against C, D, and E with the Chuncheon District Court Decision 2008Gax25015, Nov. 12, 2008, and the decision was finalized at that time by the execution recommendation to the effect that C, D, and E jointly and severally paid to the Plaintiff 58,56,923 won and 17,014,635 won per annum from October 14, 2008 to the date of full payment.

B. As to each of the real estates listed in the separate sheet No. C owned by the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant real estate”), the Chuncheon District Court, the East Sea Registry of 17,50,000 won with respect to each of the instant real estates listed in the separate sheet No. 2324, Feb. 25, 1999, respectively, completed the registration of creation of a neighboring mortgage by the obligor C and Defendant A (hereinafter “the registration of creation of a neighboring mortgage”) of the same registry, as the maximum debt amount No. 12564, Sept. 9, 1999, with respect to each of the instant real estates listed in the separate sheet No. 32,00,000, the debtor C and the mortgagee, as the maximum debt amount No. 12564, Sept. 9,

[Reasons for Recognition] Each entry of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3 (including branch numbers), and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The Plaintiff asserts that, in determining the claim against Defendant B, the second collateral mortgage contract between C and the Defendant was null and void as a false conspiracy or the second collateral obligation was extinguished by prescription after the lapse of 10 years from the date of registration of establishment of the second collateral mortgage, Defendant B is liable to implement the procedure for registration of cancellation of the second collateral mortgage registration.

Defendant B did not submit a written answer even after having served on December 31, 2014, and did not appear on the date of pleading, which is deemed to have led to the confession of the said assertion by the Plaintiff.

Therefore, Defendant B is obligated to implement the procedure such as cancellation of the registration of the establishment of the second place of the instant real estate.

3. Determination as to the claim against Defendant A

A. The summary of the argument;