1. The sentence against the accused shall be 8,000,000 won;

2. The defendant does not pay the above fine.

Punishment of the crime

On June 8, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 2 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) at the Suwon District Court’s Pyeongtaek District Court on the same day, and KRW 5 million for the same crime at the same court on December 2, 2013, respectively.

1. The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving service of the second cargo vehicle B in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents.

On October 7, 2016, the Defendant driven the above cargo while under the influence of 0.110% alcohol during blood alcohol during the influence of around 23:30 on October 7, 2016, and proceeded at a speed of about 70km from the IC to the speed of about 70km along the Dom-ro, which is located in 71-9, to the north-west industry of the Sinjin-gu.

At the time of night, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle had a duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately manipulating the steering direction and brake system and accurately.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol, and the Defendant was sent to the front side of the Defendant’s vehicle and parked in the front side of the Defendant’s vehicle C (61 Doe) with the part on the top of the front side of the Defendant’s vehicle, where the victim C (61 Doe) was under the influence of driving.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim by negligence in the course of performing the above duties, such as salt dynasium and tensions that require approximately two weeks of treatment.

2. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking) driving the B 2 truck under the influence of alcohol content of approximately 0.110% in the section of about 2km from the road in front of the white sea of 28,000 in the 3rd eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth

Accordingly, the defendant, who violated the prohibition of drinking at least twice, was driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol in violation of the above provision.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. The actual survey report, on-site;