logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 서산지원 2013.03.29 2012고단1185
모욕
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is as follows: (a) around 03:40 on November 28, 2012, at the D convenience stores operated by Seosan City B, the Defendant sent a report to the victim slope G belonging to the F District, which reported that he was unable to engage in drinking, while E and C listened to, and dispatched by E and C, for about one minute of the victim’s slope belonging to the F District G, who called out. Chewing son. She must do so. She must do so. She must do so.”

2. The facts charged in the instant case constitute a crime falling under Article 311 of the Criminal Act, which can be prosecuted only when the victim files a complaint under Article 312(1) of the Criminal Act. Since it is recognized that the victim expressed his/her intent to revoke the complaint against the Defendant around December 10, 2012, which was after the prosecution of the instant case, around December 10, 2012, the prosecution of the instant case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327(5

arrow