logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2014.06.11 2014노788
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

All appeals by the Defendants and the Prosecutor are dismissed.

Reasons

Summary of Grounds for Appeal

Each sentence of the lower court against the Defendants (Defendant A: Imprisonment for six months, confiscation, confiscation, 17,900,000 additional collection, Defendant B: fine of three million won) is too unreasonable.

The lower court’s sentence against Defendant A of the Prosecutor is too unhued and unreasonable.

Judgment

Defendant

A and the prosecutor's assertion of unfair sentencing is a criminal defendant prior to the same judgment on the grounds of unfair sentencing, and the defendant recommits the crime of this case only for four months after the termination of the period of the suspension of execution, and the period of the crime is not shorter than the period of the crime, and the profits therefrom are less favorable.

On the other hand, it is favorable that the defendant recognized his mistake and closed the business of this case.

In addition, comprehensively taking account of the circumstances leading up to the instant crime, the circumstances after the instant crime, the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, and environment, etc., the lower court’s punishment is too heavy or unreasonable. Thus, the Defendant and the prosecutor’s assertion are without merit.

Defendant

The defendant's mistake in his judgment on the assertion of unfair sentencing B is recognized, and the primary offender is favorable to the point that the crime of arranging sexual traffic in this case harms a sound sexual culture and good morals, etc. is disadvantageous to the point that the social harm is not good, and considering the circumstances of the crime in this case, the circumstances after the crime in this case, the defendant's age and character environment, etc. comprehensively taking into account various sentencing conditions as stated in the argument in this case, such as the background of the crime in this case, the circumstances after the crime in this case, the defendant's age and character environment, etc., the defendant

In conclusion, the appeal filed by the Defendants and the prosecutor is without merit, and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow