logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 속초지원 2017.09.20 2017고단140
산업안전보건법위반
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A is a person who performs new construction works for accommodation facilities outside C and six parcels at the early stage of the Sinsisi, and exercises overall control over the affairs concerning safety and health as a site warden of the B.

(a) The business owner who installs safety railing failure shall install safety devices, such as safety railing, fences, vertical fall telescopes, covers, etc. at the place where workers might fall down as the end or opening part of the work launching and passage;

Nevertheless, on February 23, 2017, the Defendant did not install a safety rail or safety room on the stairs of the front gate work of the first floor above the above ground level in the construction site.

(b) In cases where a business owner who has failed to assemble a prefabricated, etc. assembles a fry, he/she shall examine the structure thereof, prepare an assembly plan after and have it assembled according to such assembly plan.

Nevertheless, on February 23, 2017, the Defendant did not prepare assembly drawings while installing a fababababa on the first floor above A in the construction site around the above construction site.

(c)

A business owner who fails to comply with excavation shall comply with the standards of 1:0.5 to 1:1 in the case of the excavation of the ground, etc., in the case of the excavation of the ground, etc., the user shall comply with the standards of 1:0.5 to 1.

Nevertheless, on February 23, 2017, the Defendant did not comply with the statutory standards for excavating the section A, which is a common soil building in the construction site at around February 23, 2017, 1:0.25, and B, 1:0.25, and B, 1:0.15.

2. Defendant (State)B committed an act in violation of the Defendant’s duty, such as failure to install a safety rail, failure to prepare assembly drawings, failure to excavate excavation, etc., in relation to the Defendant’s duty at the time and time set forth in paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Inspection marks of supervision, reports on the results of supervision, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the corrective order;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;

A. Defendant A: Article 67 Subparag. 1 and Article 23(1) of the Industrial Safety and Health Act; Article 67 Subparag. 1 of the Industrial Safety and Health Act.

arrow