logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.05.13 2014고정1387
도로교통법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 1.5 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who drives a two-wheeled automobile owned by the Defendant for business purposes BSL (SL)125.

1. On November 29, 2013, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act, driving the said two-wheeled vehicle on the road in front of 146, Gwanak-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, with no driver’s license, and driving it on the crosswalk in order to cross the road from the direction of the Gwanak-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City.

At the same time, the DNA car driven by the victim C was in progress from the direction of the Gwanak-gu Office Tri-gu fire station to the direction of the Gwanak-gu office distance.

In such cases, a person who is engaged in driving a vehicle shall thoroughly operate the front hour, shall prevent the accident in advance by accurately operating the steering system, brakes, and other devices of the vehicle, and has a duty of care to prevent the accident in accordance with the traffic situation of the road and the structure and performance of the vehicle.

Nevertheless, in violation of this, the Defendant, while crossing a crosswalk, conflict with the front part of the vehicle driven by the victim with the left side of the two-wheeled vehicle driven by the Defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant destroyed the vehicle that the victim had driven by occupational negligence as above in terms of KRW 1,276,936.

2. On November 29, 2013, the Defendant driving a two-wheeled vehicle at a distance of about 300 meters from the vicinity of the Gwanak-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City to the same 146-day road without a two-wheeled vehicle driver’s license, as described in paragraph 1, on November 29, 2013.

3. A person who violates the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act shall not operate a motor vehicle on the road which is not covered by mandatory insurance, but the defendant operated the said two-wheeled vehicle at approximately 300 meters as described in paragraph (1) without purchasing a mandatory insurance policy.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant;

arrow