1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The details of the disposition are as follows: short-term sojourn status visit (C-3) on October 10, 2015 on the date of entry into the Republic of Korea of the Plaintiff’s Nationality date; short-term refugee status application (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on October 15, 2015 on the date of application for refugee status recognition (hereinafter “instant disposition”): The fact that there is no ground for rejection of the decision made on December 20, 2016 on the date of application for objection that there is no sufficient ground for rejection of the decision made on October 20, 2016; the fact that there is no ground for rejection of the decision made on July 18, 2017 of the date of application for objection; the statement in subparagraphs 1, 2, 1, and 2; the statement in subparagraphs 1 and 2; the purport of the entire pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion is a national of the Republic of Kenya (hereinafter “Kenya”).

In April 2014, the father of the plaintiff, who received the money from the branch in April 2014, has married the plaintiff as the head of the native village and forced him to marry.

The head of the above satisfaction was confined to and rape of the plaintiff.

After the plaintiff escaped from her mother's will, the plaintiff left the Republic of Korea in the age of his/her mother and meata and remains in his/her meata, so he/she will be killed from his/her father and head of his/her family.

As such, if the Plaintiff returned to Kenya, he/she is likely to be threatened with his/her father and head, so he/she should be recognized as a refugee.

B. Determination 1) Article 2 Subparag. 1 of the Refugee Act defines refugee status as “any foreigner who is unable or does not want to be protected by the country of nationality due to well-founded fear to recognize that he/she may be injured on the grounds of race, religion, nationality, status as a member of a specific social group, or political opinion, or is a stateless foreigner who is unable or does not want to return to the country in which he/she had resided before entering the Republic of Korea due to such fear.” 2) When comprehensively considering the evidence and evidence set forth in subparagraph 3 as well as the following circumstances that can be known by adding up the purpose of the entire pleading to the statement in subparagraph 3, the Plaintiff’s opinion on race, religion, nationality, membership of a specific social group, or political opinion.