Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for a period of one year and two months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in the operation of a math truck.

On January 16, 2017, the Defendant driven the above cargo vehicle on the 10:35th day of the 16th day of the week, and moved from the 1 lane to the string line along the 3-lane road along the eF rocketing or the left side of the said cargo vehicle while moving from the 1 lane to the string line along the 3-lane of the 3-lane on the side of the road along the e-sports Park, the Defendant did not see any e-F rocketing or other car driven by D coming from the 2nd side of the said cargo vehicle, and shocked the e-F rocketing or the left side.

At that time, there are three-lanes in which the passage of the vehicle is frequent, so in such a case, if the vehicle involved in the driving of the vehicle leaves the vehicle in the road due to the preceding accident alone on the road, the latter may collision. As such, immediately after the occurrence of the accident, there was a duty of care to promptly move the vehicle involved in the accident to a place other than the road or the road, or install the mark of the vehicle broken down on the rear at least 10 meters away from the rear of the vehicle that caused the accident and prevent the accident in advance.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and could have sufficiently predicted that the following vehicle may conflict if the vehicle involved in the accident was left on the road, and had sufficient time for about five minutes after the preceding accident, and did not take safety measures such as moving the vehicle of the Defendant, or installing the sign of the broken vehicle, etc., but failed to leave it on the two-lanes of the three-lanes, and led the victim F.F.(53 tax) who is driving on the rear side of the said cargo vehicle, to see the downside of the cargo vehicle of the Defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant’s occupational negligence caused the death of the Victim F, who is the driver of the above sealed truck, from the hospital in Jeju, around 12:55 on January 16, 2017, due to the cerebral typosis damage to the two parts, and the victim, who is the passenger of the above sealed truck, is the passenger of the above sealed truck.