The defendant shall be innocent.

1. On April 17, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 18:35 on April 17, 2014, the summary of the facts charged: (b) around D’s ticket office located in Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the Defendant took an examination of the victim F (the age of 54) in front of D’s ticket office in which he was talked with E, and (c) he took a view of the victim’s ebbbbage, and knee knee knee knee knee knee knee kne kne kne kne kne kne

2. The evidence that conforms to the fact that the Defendant assaulted F as described in the facts charged lies in the witness F’s statement in the third trial record and the police’s statement in the third trial record. However, the witness E’s statement in the third trial record and the confirmation document in E’s statement in the third trial record (E was first interview or dialogueed with the Defendant immediately before the instant case, but the F took place against the Defendant, while responding to F’s passive response to F’s trial expenses, it is difficult to believe F and the Defendant’s statement in the court and investigation agency, as long as it is difficult to believe F’s statement in the court and investigation agency and it is difficult to believe F’s statement in the court and investigation agency, there is insufficient evidence to acknowledge the facts charged in this case, and there is no other evidence to prove otherwise.

3. In conclusion, the facts charged in this case should be pronounced not guilty in accordance with the latter part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act because there is no proof of facts constituting the crime: Provided, That where the defendant cannot obtain consent of the defendant due to his/her failure to appear on the sentencing date, the public announcement of the judgment not guilty pursuant to the proviso of Article