beta
Text
The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.
Reasons
1. Around March 10, 2014, the Defendant posted the summary of the facts charged, including the phrase “assignp:/cafe.naver.com/joint signature” on the website (http:/saf.naver.com/joint venturera), stating that “The Defendant sells for 550,000 won tariffR-440 won in a coffee next to a coffee,” and “the Defendant posted the phrase “as soon as four weeks have been replaced by a new product”.
However, the fact was that the defendant was a product with a considerable period of time used to sell the product.
On March 17, 2014, the Defendant received 550,000 won under the name of the purchase price from the victim C (M, 41 years of age) who reported the sales text from March 17, 201.
2. Determination
A. In the judgment on the gist of the defendant's defense, four weeks of the replacement date, and the shape of the shoulder was produced in the manufacturing process, and there was no problem in the function of dysing coffee, and there was no fact that the defendant sold the dysday to the victim by using the above dysday for a long time.
B. The facts charged in the instant case are that the Defendant’s ruling was used for a considerable period of time and sold to the victim an article that has been caught by a marina for less than four weeks. However, in full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court, it is insufficient to recognize that the article was used for a considerable period of time as indicated in the facts charged, and that it was an article that was seriously worn out by a marina for a considerable period of time as indicated in the facts charged, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge otherwise.
1) The victim made a statement to the effect that he/she requested refund because he/she did not appear to have been used for a long time by the investigative agency and this court for a long time, and some of the days appears to have been well-known as if they were bad (the investigative record Nos. 3, 17, and 17 of the investigation record).