The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the lower court (one year of imprisonment) on the Defendant is excessively unreasonable, due to the summary of the grounds for appeal.

2. The judgment on the grounds of appeal is based on the following facts: (a) the Defendant recognized all the facts constituting the instant crime and reflects his mistake; and (b) the degree of the injury suffered by the victim is relatively heavy; and (c) the circumstances favorable to the Defendant are recognized as normal.

However, each of the crimes of this case, where the defendant escaped without a driver's license while driving a motor vehicle without a driver's license, and suffered injury by shocking the central line, is not less than less than the nature of the crime in light of the content and method of the crime, etc., the circumstances after the crime were committed, such as allowing B to make a false confession after the accident, thereby hindering the proper exercise of national judicial authority. There have been records of punishment due to the victim's agreement or failure to recover full damage, crimes without a driver's license, etc. There have been several types of recommended sentences [the escape, the first type (the escape after the injury), the aggravated area (one year to three years), the defendant's best limit of punishment for the crime, the defendant's circumstances such as the occurrence of changes in circumstances and circumstances, the possibility of excessive reduction of punishment after the accident, the circumstances and circumstances of the crime of this case, the relation between the defendant and the defendant's health, the motive and circumstances of the crime of this case, the circumstances that the court below sentenced the sentencing guidelines to the defendant in this case.