logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2014.05.29 2013고정2836
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해)등
Text

Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of 2 million won, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 1.5 million won.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. 피고인 A 피고인은 2013. 7. 18. 14:00경 남양주시 D아파트 105동 608호 E의 집에서 피해자 F(여, 64세)이 자신에게 욕을 한 후 사과를 하지 않는다는 이유로 화가 나 양손으로 피해자 F의 머리채를 잡아 흔들고 주먹으로 피해자 F의 얼굴을 1회 때리고, 발로 피해자 F의 옆구리와 가슴을 수회 걷어차고 피해자 F의 손가락을 잡아 꺾고, 이를 제지하는 피해자 G(여, 66세)의 머리카락을 두 손으로 잡아 흔들고, 피해자 G을 바닥에 넘어뜨려 발로 피해자 G의 몸을 수회 걷어찼다.

As a result, the Defendant committed assault against the victim F, resulting in a scopical scopical scopher, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment, and assaulted the victim G.

2. Defendant B

A. At around 15:00 on July 18, 2013, the Defendant: (a) committed assault against the victim G on the ground that the victim was aware that the victim was assaulted with F by putting the Defendant at the time and place set forth in the above paragraph (1) by putting the Defendant at the Defendant’s son’s seat, at the time and place; (b) on the ground that the victim did not make an answer; (c) however, on the ground that the victim did not have an answer, the Defendant assaulted the victim G by making it possible for the victim to use the victim’s buck with the victim.

B. The Defendant, around 16:00 on the same day, was above D apartment 106, and around D apartment 106.

For the same reason, the victim G was assaulted about 10 times by drinking the victim G when the head of the victim G was 10 times.

3. At around 16:00 on July 18, 2013, the Defendants’ co-principaled the D Apartment 106-dong entrance, Namyang-si, Namyang-si, and Defendant A and F, when wraped as described in the above paragraph 1, the victim G was mistaken for the Defendant A to have been placed behind the Defendant, and the Defendant A was able to have the victim’s face two times with plastic water disease, and Defendant B was able to have the victim’s face from her finger hand. The Defendant B, who was the escape victim, was able to have the victim go beyond a lar, and acted as the Defendant B was able to have the victim go through the direction of the traffic.

In this respect.

arrow