logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.11.27 2015노2282
특정경제범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(배임)등
Text

All appeals filed by the defendant and prosecutor are dismissed.

Reasons

Summary of Grounds for Appeal

The prosecutor's misunderstanding of the legal principle (the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes) (the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes) constitutes the market price at the time of the disposition of machinery recorded in the facts of the crime in the judgment of the court below, which is the case of the breach of trust, and the market

Nevertheless, the court below found the defendant not guilty of the amount of profit in property due to the act of breach of trust in this case, on the premise that the defendant actually received the purchase price, and erred by misapprehending the legal principles on the amount of profit in Article 3 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes

The sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (one year and six months of imprisonment) is too uneasible and unfair.

The sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (unfair punishment) is too unreasonable.

Judgment

The summary of this part of the facts charged is that the Defendant, as the representative director of D, actually operates D and E. For the sake of the Bank of Korea, the Defendant violated his duty to keep the machines listed in the facts charged in the judgment below for the Bank of Korea, and thereby, caused D Co., Ltd. to sell the said machines en bloc to H on August 2014, in a manner that it violated his duty to do so, and thereby, caused D Co., Ltd to a total of KRW 580,00,000 (= KRW 340,000,000) equivalent to the maximum debt amount of the security right established on the said machines (= KRW 240,00,000). The Defendant acquired each pecuniary benefit equivalent to KRW 705,00,000 of the maximum debt amount of the security right established on the said machines, and caused damage to the victim.

The lower court determined that the crime of violating Article 3 (1) 2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes due to the breach of trust is committed.

arrow