1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 220,00,000 for the Plaintiff and 5% per annum from November 1, 2014 to April 10, 2015; and (b) the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. Defendant (formerly, Co., Ltd.) is a company that operates a Pataco consortium (hereinafter “instant golf club”) located in 145-10, a small-ro, a small-scale, in the south of Chuncheon-si, and the Plaintiff is a member of the instant golf club.

B. On June 23, 2009, the Plaintiff prepared and submitted a “written application for the establishment of a new golf club” to the Defendant, and the said written application states that “20,000,000 won paid for subscription shall be converted into a membership security deposit on the date of establishment of a new golf club.” The Defendant’s application also states that “I will subscribe with the deposit money for the establishment of a new golf club in this case,” and “I will make a decision at the time of conversion into a new golf club into a new member, and matters necessary for the issuance thereof shall be publicly notified after the

The plaintiff deposited KRW 219 million to the defendant by July 31, 2009, and paid the remaining amount of KRW 100 million to the defendant by July 31, 2009, and then paid the remaining amount of KRW 1 million by around 2010.

5. 20. The defendant received membership cards.

C. In the process of establishing the instant golf course in around 2009, the number of members recruited with the membership fee of KRW 220 million, including the Plaintiff, was approximately 50 persons including the Plaintiff. Of the above members, the Defendant demanded the return of the membership fee against the Defendant in 2014.

Accordingly, from June 2014 to September 2014, the defendant held a briefing session or a briefing session on business management over several occasions and discussed the issue of return of the membership fee with the relevant members.

On June 23, 2014, the Defendant sent to the Plaintiff a written application form for the return of the membership fee (the phrase “the withdrawal of a member and the return of the membership fee upon the request for the return of the refund of the membership fee because five years have elapsed since the maturity of the term of the membership agreement). The Plaintiff sent the same year to the Plaintiff.

6. 25. 25. Around July 31, 2014, an application for return was submitted to the Defendant’s side by stating the due date as “assign 31, 2014.”

The golf course of this case is not more than the rule of this case.