logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2013.12.05 2013고정3736
상해
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. On April 24, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 00:12, at the main point of “D” located in Young-gu, Busan Metropolitan City, the Defendant: (b) caused the victim E (the age of 46) who was a senior ship of a high school (the age of 46) by coercioning the victim’s neck by force on the part of other ships on the ground that she would engage in an exceptional behavior and words to other ships; and (c) led the victim to the main part of the charges; (d) led the victim up to the main part of the charges; and (e) led the victim beyond the upper part of the floor in front of and rear, thereby causing injury to the victim, such as chilled salt, tension, etc. requiring two-day medical treatment.

2. The victim E’s investigative agency and the defendant in this court stated that “the victim” in the victim’s investigative agency and the victim in this court expressed that “the victim was imprisoned by being towed by being towed by selling the victim’s secret while taking a desire to be imprison,” and there was an injury diagnosis letter to the effect that the victim’s imprisoned by being towed.

However, the following facts or circumstances revealed by the record, namely, ① the Defendant and E were participating in the Fdong Meeting (GG school) conference at the time and time and place indicated in the facts charged in this case; ② E was started to punish H and speech meetings 20 years’ earlier, ③ the following me called “E was sent to the Defendant,” and ④ The I appears in this court that “the Defendant caused the chest when he wishes to cause E,” but did not put it out,” rather than the Defendant’s statement to the effect that “the Defendant does not have any her desire to take on the part of E,” ⑤ the I appears to have made a statement consistent with the Defendant’s vindication in the military branch as the motive of the E school, and the I appears to have no more credibility than the Defendant’s present E and the Defendant’s oral statement to the effect that it did not appear to have been presented.

arrow