The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. In light of the fact that the accused is against the gist of the grounds for appeal, the punishment imposed by the original judgment (4 months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The fact that the Defendant recognized all the facts charged and reflected is favorable to the Defendant.

However, the Defendant committed the instant crime without being aware of the fact that he/she was under suspension of execution due to the violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) and the Defendant knew of the fact that he/she received a request for a summary order of KRW 1 million as a result of the crime of interference with business against the victim, thereby interfering with business, and thus, the nature of the crime is not good, and the fact that he/she did not agree with the victim is disadvantageous to the Defendant.

In full view of the above circumstances and other circumstances shown in the records and pleadings, since the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.