1. The defendant is the owner of the building report as stated in attached Form 2, and the permission for diversion of farmland as stated in attached Form 2.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff acquired the ownership of the instant land on the ground of sale by voluntary auction on July 14, 2014, at the auction procedure (hereinafter “instant auction”) with respect to each parcel of land listed in the [Attachment 1] List, which was owned by the Defendant (hereinafter “instant land”), and completed the registration of ownership transfer on July 22, 2014.

B. At the time of the auction of this case, the Defendant continued to perform the basic construction of the building in the instant land with the permission for construction, permission for diversion of farmland, and permission for development as stated in attached Table 2. The Defendant was in the condition that the floor structure of the building (hereinafter “instant structure”) remains.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 3, 8, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 1 (including each number if there are several numbers) and the fact inquiry results of this court on the so-called market, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The defendant's judgment on the previous defense on the merits of this case asserts that there is no interest in the lawsuit of this case since the ownership of the structure of this case and the right to permit farmland conversion and the right to permit development of the land of this case as stated in attached Form 2 on the ownership of this case and the right to permit farmland conversion. However, as seen later, the plaintiff acquired the ownership of the structure of this case attached to the land of this case through the auction of this case. In order to exercise the ownership on the structure of this case, it is necessary to change the name of the owner of the building report as stated in attached Form 2, the name of the permitted owner of the building and the title of the permitted owner of the permit for farmland conversion and

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. Judgment on the merits

A. The structure of the Plaintiff’s assertion 1 of the parties concerned is suspended without only the foundation construction of the building.