A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On March 7, 2008, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 3 million with a fine of KRW 5 million due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act, and a fine of KRW 5 million with the same court on March 26, 2010.

At around 18:30 on July 15, 2013, the Defendant driven C Poter cargo vehicles at approximately 20 meters in front of the “Fresh capital frightin parking lot” located in Ischeon-si, 0.188% of blood alcohol concentration without a driver’s license.

Summary of Evidence

1. Court statement of the defendant (the second trial date);

1. A report on detection of a host driver;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the driving license ledger;

1. Relevant provisions of Article 148-2 (1) 1, Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense (a point of driving sound), subparagraph 1 of Article 152 and Article 43 of the same Act;

1. Punishment provided for in Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of ordinary concurrent crimes (the punishment imposed on a violation of the Road Traffic Act of heavier punishment);

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including a circumstance that may be taken into account the circumstances of the instant case);

1. The part concerning dismissal of prosecution under Article 62-2 (1) and the main sentence of Article 62-2 (2) of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on Probation, Etc.;

1. Around July 15, 2013, the summary of the facts charged was assaulted by the Defendant on the hand floor that the victim D reported the Defendant’s act of drinking on the road in front of the 'battopy sattopy in the Halle Eup in Ison-si, Ison-si’ on the ground that the Defendant reported the Defendant’s act of drinking.

2. The determination is a case that falls under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the intent expressed by the victim under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act.

However, according to the written agreement prepared by the victim which was bound in the trial records, the victim, after the prosecution of this case was instituted, shall be October 2013.