Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person who operates a farm and raises a dog and a lawsuit.

A person who intends to install a livestock excreta waste-generating facility in excess of a certain scale shall obtain permission from or report to the Mayor, and shall ensure that livestock excreta is discharged into public waters in an appropriate manner.

Nevertheless, the Defendant:

1. From April 20, 200 to 11 Dong-dong in Pyeongtaek-si, Gyeonggi-do, and D Ilwon, raising 700 m2 in a 170 m2 in a 1970 m2, and operating a farm with a size of at least 60 m2 in a 700 m2 in a 700 m2, which is the standard for discharging facilities to be reported by raising 94 m2 in a 3 m2 in a 700 m2, and operating a farm with a size of at least 60 m30 m2 in a 100 m2 in a 1650 m2 in a 160 m36 m2 in a 1650 m36 m2 in a 2008.

2. Around April 23, 2014, the livestock excreta and washing water in capacity were discharged into public waters through drainage channels by failing to manage the livestock excreta discharge facilities in the above breeding ground.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on the written accusation;

1. Article 50 of the relevant Act and subparagraph 3 of Article 50 of the Act on the Management and Use of Livestock Excreta selected for facts constituting a crime, and Articles 11 (3) (the person who raises livestock using a waste-generating facility reported by any false means), Article 49 subparagraph 4 of the Act on the Management and Use of Livestock Excreta (the person who discharges livestock excreta from a waste-generating facility reported by any false means to public waters),

1.Article 37 (former part), Articles 38(1)2 and 50 of the Criminal Code among concurrent crimes;

1. The reason for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act is that the accused recognizes the crime and reflects it, and that there is no same criminal record, in favor of the accused.