logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2016.04.20 2015고단1186
사기등
Text

1. Defendant A

(a) The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for one year and four months;

B. Attached Form among the facts charged against the Defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From January 2014 to February 2015, the Defendants jointly operated a mobile phone agency with the trade name of “J” from around 2015 to around 1186, and thereafter, the Defendants opened and operated “M” and “N” in Busan Southern-gu L.

The Defendants conspired to open a mobile phone using another person's personal information, which was borrowed from or had already been held by an unspecified number of people, in order to suggest the result of the opening of the mobile phone to El Dok Plus Co., Ltd.

However, at the time, the Defendants’ operation “J” did not have any intent or ability to pay the cost of a mobile phone or the fee for the use of the mobile phone on behalf of the nominal owner, even if the mobile phone is opened as above due to low cell phone sales performance and lack of operational funds.

1. Fraud - The Defendants concerned in collusion with the above, Defendant A, on April 14, 2014, shall open the cell phone on the part of the victimO and terminate it three months after the opening of the cell phone on the part of the victimO, and shall pay the ender, installment, and installment charges on the part of the victim.

“A false representation was made.”

However, even if the Defendants opened a cell phone in the name of the victim, they did not have the intent or ability to pay the mobile phone price or the user fee for the above reasons.

The Defendants, after obtaining permission for the use of the name from the victimO, had the victimO bear a total of 1,677,30 won in the name of the end payment and the use fee, and acquired property profits equivalent to the same amount from around that time to December 30, 2014, as shown in the attached Table 1, the Defendants suffered property damage equivalent to 34,259,539 won in total to 16 victims, as shown in the attached Table 1.

2. Fraud, fabrication of private documents, and

arrow