Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for four months, and by imprisonment without prison labor for eight months, respectively.

However, from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, Defendant.

Criminal facts

Defendant

A is the general manager in charge of construction and safety management of the entire section of the construction, who is the construction site at the site of G, which is a public road substitution bypass road construction works between F in Ansan-si, and the general manager in charge of construction of the road reported to the Dong-dong Police Station in connection with the construction of the above section of the construction. Defendant B is the director in H, and the person in charge of the actual construction site who subcontracted the above section of the construction site and actually performed the work at

Defendant

B On December 4, 2015, around 14:30 on 4 December 2015, it occupied two lanes at the construction site of J national highways-dong-si I and performed the tea-line removal work.

In such a case, the general manager of road construction has a duty of care to reside at the entire construction site, to patrol the construction section periodically with the safety manager, to control whether there is any dangerous behavior or facility of workers, and the construction site manager has a duty of care to fully install safety facilities such as signal numbers, guide boards, PEdrums, and wurgs so that the vehicles that pass a large lane can safely pass.

Nevertheless, the Defendants neglected to perform the above duty of care, and Defendant A was negligent in the course of business due to the failure of Defendant A to stay in the above construction site or to look at a dangerous facility or work site while going to another area, and Defendant B was placed in two lanes on the ground that Defendant B is scheduled to move to one lane immediately after completing the two-lane work.

The victim K (58 tax) who was driven by the occupational negligence by which both the PE drum and the signal number are charged, and the victim K (58 tax) who was driven by the two lanes in the after and after the mast;

L 1 ton of cargo has concealed the side side of the driver's seat of the car which is enclosed by the front side of the steering.

The Defendants, by the above occupational negligence, suffered injuries, such as duplicating cages at fages, which require approximately six weeks of medical treatment, at the same time, to the above victims.