A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Criminal power is sentenced to a fine of three million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Daegu District Court on August 7, 2012, and a fine of six million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Daegu District Court on January 30, 2013.

Criminal facts

On May 31, 2013, the Defendant, without a driver’s license, driven a B B B B spon in a 2km section from the front of a cafeteria located in the trade name, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seoul, to the front of the Csponcoia, without a driver’s license on May 31, 2013, while under the influence of alcohol by 0.116%.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Report on the circumstances of the driving of a motor vehicle;

1. The circumstantial statement of the employee;

1. Details of inquiries about management of reports on the detection of hosts;

1. Registers of driver's licenses;

1. Disqualifications of the main office;

1. Records of judgment: Application of criminal records, etc. inquiry inquiry records, investigation reports, and Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of Article 148-2 (1) 1, and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting a crime (the point of a sound driving) and subparagraph 1 of Article 152 of the Road Traffic Act and Articles 152 and 43 of the Road Traffic Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Although the punishment of the defendant for the reason of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act is limited to the punishment of the defendant for the reason of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the order to attend a compliance driving lecture, the punishment as ordered shall be determined in consideration of the overall normal materials revealed in the public trial process, such as the fact that the defendant does not reach recidivism, the fact that the defendant has