Defendant

A Imprisonment for one year, and each of the defendants B shall be punished by imprisonment for ten months.

Punishment of the crime

【Defendant B’s past record of crime committed on February 11, 2009, who was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a crime of fraud on the part of Suwon method Board for the same year and two months.

7. 23. The above judgment becomes final and conclusive, and on February 10, 2010, the Chuncheon District Court has been sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year to four months of imprisonment for fraud in its original branch of the District Court.

7. 10. The above judgment became final and conclusive.

[Criminal Facts]

1. On May 28, 2008, the Defendants conspired to operate a construction advertising company with the trade name of Jungcheon-si Etel 301, F, and on May 28, 2008, the Defendants were directors of the victim I Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “victim”) at the law firm H office located in the second floor of the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government G Building around May 28, 2008. The Defendants were allowed to purchase the commercial buildings through the commercial buildings on the basis of the K redevelopment shop sales agency. It is also possible to purchase them through the commercial buildings.

F has succeeded to attracting foreign capital equivalent to 55 billion won in the Republic of Korea.

The funds are opened several times, and the offices inspection is conducted on the part of the investor and bank before the funds are entered.

The phrase “abreging to lend 100 million won,” was read as “abreging.”

However, in fact, the Defendants did not attract foreign capital, and did not have the intention or ability to purchase the K redevelopment commercial building by proxy or through the commercial building, and there was a shortage of funds at the time, so there was no intention or ability to repay the borrowed money from the victims company as agreed.

Nevertheless, on May 29, 2008, the Defendants deceptioned the victim company and acquired 100 million won from the victim company to the national bank account (L) in the name of the Defendant B.

2. 2008. 6. 29. 자 사기 피고인들은 공모하여, 2008. 6. 29. 경 고양시 일산 동구 M 타워 1동 312호에 있는 피해자 회사 사무실에서, 피해자 회사의 이사인 J 등에게 “F에서 K 인테리어 사업권을 땄다.

The cost of sampling is necessary and the additional cost for attracting foreign capital is also required, and there is a difference to lend 100 million won abroad.