1. The plaintiff, the defendant B and C jointly 2,857,143 won, the defendant B and D jointly 22,857,143 won, and the defendant B 34,285.

1. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of arguments as to the cause of the claim Gap, Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 3, Eul No. 2 and Eul No. 2 and No. 4, defendant B and his spouse Eul issued one promissory note with the face value of 80,00,00 and the due date of May 30, 203, Eul Co., Ltd and Eul Co., Ltd, with the value of 30,50,000 won, and one set of five promissory notes with the inside of the place of payment, and Eul Co., Ltd and Eul Co., Ltd, with the value of 3/7,07,00,000 won and 20,000 won and 24,000 won and 20,000 won and 30,000 won and 5,000 won and 5,06,00 won and 20,000 won and 5,06,07,000 won and 5,06.

I would like to say.

In addition, since a final and conclusive judgment in favor of the party has res judicata effect, if the party who received the final and conclusive judgment in favor of the party in the previous suit files a lawsuit identical to the final and conclusive judgment in favor of the party in the previous suit, the subsequent suit